Skip to main content

Table 2 Precision and accuracy for determination of ROS, ATO, EZE and SIM using the proposed MEKC–DAD method

From: Development of a sustainable multianalyte MEKC method for quantitation of the antihyperlipidemic drugs ezetimibe together with three statins. Greenness and whiteness appraisal studies

Analyte

Type of analysis

Nominal value (μg/ml)

Found ± SDa (μg/ml)

RSD (%)b

Er (%)c

ROS

Within-day

20

20.01 ± 0.08

0.40

0.05

40

40.04 ± 0.19

0.48

0.10

80

80.14 ± 0.62

0.77

0.18

Between-days

20

19.86 ± 0.25

1.26

− 0.70

40

39.82 ± 0.29

0.73

− 0.45

80

79.94 ± 0.59

0.74

− 0.07

ATO

Within-day

20

20.14 ± 0.19

0.94

0.70

40

40.13 ± 0.39

0.97

0.33

80

80.04 ± 0.21

0.26

0.05

Between-days

20

19.87 ± 0.31

1.56

− 0.65

40

40.03 ± 0.44

1.10

0.08

80

79.94 ± 0.35

0.44

− 0.07

EZE

Within-day

20

20.20 ± 0.11

0.55

1.00

40

40.03 ± 0.11

0.28

0.08

80

80.19 ± 0.33

0.41

0.24

Between-days

20

20.13 ± 0.22

1.09

0.65

40

39.82 ± 0.39

0.98

− 0.45

80

80.15 ± 0.48

0.60

0.19

SIM

Within-day

20

20.02 ± 0.14

0.70

0.10

40

40.37 ± 0.09

0.22

0.93

80

80.02 ± 0.25

0.31

0.03

Between-days

20

19.92 ± 0.38

1.91

− 0.40

40

40.18 ± 0.34

0.85

0.45

80

79.93 ± 0.34

0.43

− 0.09

  1. aMean ± standard deviation for three determinations
  2. b% Relative standard deviation
  3. c% Relative error