Skip to main content

Table 5 Statistical analysis of the results obtained by the developed chemommetric methods and the reported HPLC methods for the determination of PAR and HYO in pharmaceutical preparation

From: Development and validation of chemometric-assisted spectrophotometric models for efficient quantitation of a binary mixture of supportive treatments in COVID-19 in the presence of its toxic impurities: a comparative study for eco-friendly assessment

Parameters

PAR

HYO

Proposed methods

Reported methoda

Proposed methods

Reported methoda

PLS

PCR

ANN

MCR-ALS

HPLC

PLS

PCR

ANN

MCR-ALS

HPLC

Meanb (%)

100.93

100.68

100.41

100.90

101.85

100.89

100.72

100.55

100.77

101.52

SD

0.86

0.75

0.72

0.77

0.48

0.85

0.65

0.88

0.83

0.52

Variance

0.74

0.56

0.51

0.60

0.23

0.73

0.42

0.78

0.69

0.27

N

6.00

6.00

6.00

6.00

6.00

6.00

6.00

6.00

6.00

6.00

Student’s t-teste (2.23)c

0.44

0.31

0.25

0.39

–

0.65

0.43

0.43

0.54

–

F-valuec (5.05)c

3.15

2.41

2.20

2.55

–

2.65

1.54

2.83

2.50

–

  1. aHPLC method using water: methanol (50:50, V/V pH adjusted to 3.9 with CF3COOH acid) at flow rate of 1 ml/min, detection at 2210.0 nm [29]
  2. bAverage of 6 experiments
  3. cFigures between parentheses represent the corresponding tabulated values of t and f at P = 0.05