Skip to main content

Table 3 Prediction of validation set samples using the proposed chemometric models

From: Novel analytical method based on chemometric models applied to UV–Vis spectrophotometric data for simultaneous determination of Etoricoxib and Paracetamol in presence of Paracetamol impurities

Concentration (µg mL−1)

PLS

ANN

MCR-ALS

Recovery %

Recovery %

Recovery %

ETO

PCM

PAP

PHA

ETO

PCM

PAP

PHA

ETO

PCM

PAP

PHA

ETO

PCM

PAP

PHA

3

10

3

5

99.76

98.83

98.92

99.18

98.59

98.02

98.81

99.12

100.68

99.47

98.77

98.91

7.5

4

5

5

101.01

99.08

99.54

98.27

99.28

100.20

99.12

98.90

98.44

100.35

99.98

99.45

3

8

5

4

99.98

100.44

100.88

98.66

98.22

98.43

100.57

99.97

100.26

99.11

98.49

99.62

6

8

4

6

100.06

98.91

99.73

100.94

99.72

98.50

98.62

100.37

100.67

99.76

98.88

100.06

4.5

10

5

6

99.25

100.18

101.45

100.39

99.50

98.83

100.56

101.60

99.22

99.90

101.30

100.02

6

10

2

2

99.99

99.76

102.62

98.48

100.90

99.44

99.04

98.45

99.86

100.70

98.14

98.83

3

6

2

3

100.82

99.11

101.81

98.56

99.67

99.43

98.69

98.30

100.33

98.77

99.65

98.92

Mean

100.12

99.49

100.71

99.21

99.41

98.98

99.34

99.53

99.92

99.72

99.32

99.40

RSD%

0.604

0.626

1.343

1.050

0.869

0.757

0.850

1.184

0.829

0.675

1.089

0.530

RMSEPa

0.0555

0.1110

0.0540

0.0513

0.0937

0.1353

0.1080

0.0849

0.0495

0.0715

0.0420

0.0440

  1. aRoot mean square error of prediction