Skip to main content

Table 5 Statistical comparison for the results obtained by the proposed chemometric models and the reported HPLC method for the determination of ETO and PCM in their pure powdered form

From: Novel analytical method based on chemometric models applied to UV–Vis spectrophotometric data for simultaneous determination of Etoricoxib and Paracetamol in presence of Paracetamol impurities

Parameter

PLS

ANN

MCR-ALS

Reported HPLC methoda

ETO

PCM

ETO

PCM

ETO

PCM

ETO

PCM

Mean

100.21

99.49

99.13

98.98

99.92

99.42

99.98

99.89

S.D

0.605

0.626

0.746

0.749

0.828

0.645

0.992

1.102

Variance

0.366

0.391

0.556

0.562

0.685

0.416

0.984

1.214

n

7

7

7

7

7

7

9

9

Student t testb (2.145)

0.327

0.854

1.884

1.868

0.593

0.998

  

F valueb (4.15)

2.688

3.098

1.768

2.164

1.435

2.919

  
  1. aHPLC method using a C18 column as the stationary phase and a mixture consisting of (methanol: water) in ratio (70:30 v/v) as a mobile phase. The mobile phase was pumped at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1. UV detection was carried out at 235.0 nm
  2. bThe values in parentheses are the corresponding tabulated two-tailed values at p = 0.05